<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UFC RESULTS &#187; Affliction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmaresultsonline.com/tag/affliction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmaresultsonline.com</link>
	<description>UFC News, Results - Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 02:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Affliction going head to head with UFC 100?</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaresultsonline.com/2009/03/affliction-going-head-to-head-with-ufc-100/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmaresultsonline.com/2009/03/affliction-going-head-to-head-with-ufc-100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affliction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC 100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ufcresults.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via The Baltimore Sun There are a few puzzling stories in the news lately. The first is the rumor that Affliction may try to go head to head with UFC 100. I don’t know how I feel about this. Check that &#8212; it’s clearly a stupid decision. While Affliction can compete with UFC pay-per-view replays [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/mma/blog/2009/03/competing_with_ufc_100_and_gre_1.html">The Baltimore Sun</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">There are a few puzzling stories in the news lately. The first is the rumor that Affliction may try to go head to head with UFC 100. I don’t know how I feel about this. Check that &#8212; it’s clearly a stupid decision.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">While Affliction can compete with UFC pay-per-view replays and free, dumbed-down cards on Spike, Affliction cannot compete with UFC 100. I understand the UFC’s move to counter-program against Affliction, but it makes absolutely no sense the other way around.</p>
<p>[phpbay]mma affliction, 3, &#8220;&#8221;, &#8220;&#8221;[/phpbay]<br />
Surely they can&#8217;t be dumb enough to go against one of the most stacked and anticipated PPV cards ever, Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmaresultsonline.com/2009/03/affliction-going-head-to-head-with-ufc-100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk
Object Caching 218/243 objects using disk

Served from: www.mmaresultsonline.com @ 2012-02-09 12:08:10 -->
